<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The perfect osCommerce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clubosc.com/the-perfect-oscommerce.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clubosc.com/the-perfect-oscommerce.html</link>
	<description>Showcasing osCommerce...the good, the bad and the ugly!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:32:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.clubosc.com/the-perfect-oscommerce.html/comment-page-1#comment-3882</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubosc.com/?p=401#comment-3882</guid>
		<description>@Matti, it is because of this way of thinking that marketing people exist and work together with developers. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matti, it is because of this way of thinking that marketing people exist and work together with developers. <img src='http://www.clubosc.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.clubosc.com/the-perfect-oscommerce.html/comment-page-1#comment-3876</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 11:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubosc.com/?p=401#comment-3876</guid>
		<description>Thanks Matti.  Interestingly I set up a new site the other day with absolutely no SEO except for the title tag.  Even the domain name is not really anything to do with the product.  First page in Google.  I did notice that the snippet of text that Google gives was compleetly useless (something about paypal), so I added a meta description to see how it goes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Matti.  Interestingly I set up a new site the other day with absolutely no SEO except for the title tag.  Even the domain name is not really anything to do with the product.  First page in Google.  I did notice that the snippet of text that Google gives was compleetly useless (something about paypal), so I added a meta description to see how it goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matti Ressler</title>
		<link>http://www.clubosc.com/the-perfect-oscommerce.html/comment-page-1#comment-3875</link>
		<dc:creator>Matti Ressler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubosc.com/?p=401#comment-3875</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the slow reply, I have been on leave.

@Gary - I base some of my views largely on what Google&#039;s own search team have said on this topic: http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls.html

I know that lots of people will argue black and blue how good SEF URLs are for rankings (and that the Google guys are full of it), however most of those people make money from doing such things for other people.  I will argue black and blue that the most important things are actual content and a structure that reflects that content, most importantly title tags. Meta tags that reflect actual page content will also quickly push up a site&#039;s rankings.  Good, descriptive, keyword rich and unique page content is very important.

@Luke - I have never looked at the URL in search results and I doubt very much that many people do.  The most important thing is the search result &lt;i&gt;title&lt;/i&gt; (which links to the result).  Here is where good, dynamic title tags come into play in a huge way. This is the first place I always look in search results and often the only place.  I have many times seen search results where each title is just the same static page title for every single page on the website (a standard osCommerce for example).

Looking at the link you posted, the most important thing I have said ranks at number 1 with &quot;66% very high importance&quot; for page specific factors.  This is contrasted with SEF URls which is at number 10 with &quot;33% low importance.  These figures are of course based on people&#039;s opinions, which are more abundant than....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the slow reply, I have been on leave.</p>
<p>@Gary &#8211; I base some of my views largely on what Google&#039;s own search team have said on this topic: <a href="http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls.html" rel="nofollow">http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/09/dynamic-urls-vs-static-urls.html</a></p>
<p>I know that lots of people will argue black and blue how good SEF URLs are for rankings (and that the Google guys are full of it), however most of those people make money from doing such things for other people.  I will argue black and blue that the most important things are actual content and a structure that reflects that content, most importantly title tags. Meta tags that reflect actual page content will also quickly push up a site&#039;s rankings.  Good, descriptive, keyword rich and unique page content is very important.</p>
<p>@Luke &#8211; I have never looked at the URL in search results and I doubt very much that many people do.  The most important thing is the search result <i>title</i> (which links to the result).  Here is where good, dynamic title tags come into play in a huge way. This is the first place I always look in search results and often the only place.  I have many times seen search results where each title is just the same static page title for every single page on the website (a standard osCommerce for example).</p>
<p>Looking at the link you posted, the most important thing I have said ranks at number 1 with &#034;66% very high importance&#034; for page specific factors.  This is contrasted with SEF URls which is at number 10 with &#034;33% low importance.  These figures are of course based on people&#039;s opinions, which are more abundant than&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joop</title>
		<link>http://www.clubosc.com/the-perfect-oscommerce.html/comment-page-1#comment-3861</link>
		<dc:creator>Joop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubosc.com/?p=401#comment-3861</guid>
		<description>- Strict seperation of php, layout and javascript coding.
- On-the-fly compression css and javascript.
- On-demand loading css and javascript
- Automatic selection best type caching (apc, memache or files)
Plug and play modules and box additions (like modx snippets en plug-ins).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- Strict seperation of php, layout and javascript coding.<br />
- On-the-fly compression css and javascript.<br />
- On-demand loading css and javascript<br />
- Automatic selection best type caching (apc, memache or files)<br />
Plug and play modules and box additions (like modx snippets en plug-ins).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.clubosc.com/the-perfect-oscommerce.html/comment-page-1#comment-3855</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clubosc.com/?p=401#comment-3855</guid>
		<description>Tim - is &quot;v2 final&quot; what the people at osquantum released?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim &#8211; is &#034;v2 final&#034; what the people at osquantum released?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

